|
By Mar-Vic
Cagurangan
Variety News Staff
THE ongoing budget talks,
now in their eighth week, continued to polarize Republicans and Democrats
who have conflicting visions of where the process is going.
As the legislative session turns into a de facto public hearing, the budget
process is losing its direction, according to Sen. Ben Pangelinan, D-Barrigada.
The whole process has come to a point where there are no meaningful
discussions among senators anymore. This process has no direction. I dont
see any roadmap anymore, Pangelinan said.
The Republican leadership has not been able to communicate a vision
of what will happen. They only give us a doom-and-gloom picture of what
may happen, he added.
Speaker Mark Forbes, R-Sinajana, however, said everyone knows where
this process is goingits a balancing act where, at the end,
you get a zero balance in the budget.
Senators have been struggling to balance the 2007 budget by assessing
the impact of fee increases, the 2.5 percent funding cuts and the 5 percent
deappropriations enforced on agencies that were sanctioned for failure
to meet the financial reporting requirements.
Vice Speaker Eddie Calvo, R-Maite, said Bill 74 has evolved from its original
form as submitted by the administration.
We are definitely moving. This is a very uncommon budget that we
are dealing with in an uncommon fashion. The process is not going the
normal way because Bill 74 is not a normal bill. It was sent to us by
the administration halfway through the fiscal year, Calvo said.
More members of the community showed up at the session hall to testify
on the 2007 revised budget bill yesterday since Calvo extended the invitation
to the legislative forum on Tuesday.
The tension between the two parties flared up Tuesday afternoon when Democrats
walked out of the budget session, protesting Calvos decision to
bring business representatives into the session hall to testify on Bill
74.
Minority senators insist that a public hearing is the right venue to solicit
public input.
This Legislature ignores every rule in the book, Pangelinan
said.
Sen. David Shimizu, D-Inarajan, noted that the session may have turned
into a default public hearing, but it came a little too late. They
invited the public just when the process is almost over. Its like
sending invitations to a wedding on the wedding day itself. People will
come when the party is over, he said.
Shimizu also noted that only business leaders and employers have been
coming to testify before the committee of the whole. The employees
and ordinary citizens are the ones who will be more affected by these
fee increases, he added.
Pangelinan frowned on the Republicans allegedly erratic attendance
at the session. Its an insult for us Democrats who sit through
the whole process, day in and day out, while we watch some Republican
senators leave and walk back into the session only when they need to exercise
the power of the majority to protect a special interest, he alleged.
They say they have other business to attend to. When the Legislature
is in session, theres nothing more important than the issues currently
being discussed, Pangelinan added.
Forbes sought to pacify the Democrats, saying that partisan bickering
is the last thing that we need in the Legislature at this particular
time.
I know everybody is stressed. But we have to keep our cool and we
should avoid making accusations against each other. Lets not get
personal. Lets keep our eye on the target. We have to get there,
Forbes said.
All senators, regardless of their partisanship, are welcome to participate.
In fact, many of the amendments made to the bill came from minority senators,
the speaker said.
Sen. Rory Respicio, D-Agana Heights, meanwhile, defended his amendment
to prohibit furlough as a means to assuage the impact of the 5 percent
deappropriations on delinquent agencies.
The amendment has been criticized by business leaders who insist that
downsizing the bureaucracy would help cut the cost of government operations.
I dont agree that government employees must be used as sacrificial
lambs, Respicio said, adding that the option of laying people off
would take its toll on public funds.
We will have more people with no disposable income. When they lose
their jobs, they will apply for social services such as welfare and public
assistance, Respicio said.
Administration officials return to the session hall today to present new
numbers based on revised fees and explain the impact of the 5 percent
deappropriations.
|