|
By Haidee V.
Eugenio
Variety Assistant Editor
SOME 200 names have been taken
off the Department of Labors list of 1,001 individuals it says are
overstaying in the CNMI as of yesterday afternoon, according
to Rose Ada-Hocog, administrator of Labors Administrative Hearing
Office.
Since Labors publication of the list on Wednesday, nonresident workers
with valid entry permits, who have pending labor cases and who have other
proofs of legal employment in the CNMI have been lining up at the departments
Enforcement Section to have their names deleted from the no hire
list.
About 200 names have been deleted from the list as of Thursday,
Ada-Hocog said.
More names are expected to be deleted.
Nonresidents whose names may have been inadvertently included on the list
have until Feb. 5, Monday, to report to Labor.
We will issue another notice with a cleared listing of names,
she said.
Former Senate legal counsel Stephen C. Woodruff, now a private attorney,
earlier warned that the governments no hire list may
have violated privacy, due process of law and other rights guaranteed
by federal and CNMI law.
Press Secretary Charles P. Reyes Jr. yesterday said the notice clearly
invited corrections and corrections are being made, when asked whether
the Fitial administration will issue an apology for the erroneous no
hire list.
Woodruff said his office has received more than a dozen inquiries from
nonresidents whose names were wrongfully included on the no hire
list.
Were still in a fact-finding phase
Theres been
no decision yet (whether a lawsuit will be filed against the government),
said Woodruff, adding that they expect more inquiries in the next few
days.
Labor, in the public notice, said no employer in the CNMI may hire or
employ any of the persons on the list for any purpose or position, including
household or domestic positions.
More than a dozen workers interviewed on Wednesday and yesterday showed
their valid entry permits and other proofs of legal employment but whose
names were included on the no hire list.
Labor said it did not issue the list just because the U.S. Congress is
considering the federalization of the CNMIs labor and immigration
policies, but as part of the departments reform efforts.
But Woodruff said there appears to be no statutory or regulatory
authority for the publication of this list. Neither is there any information
on how and from what sources the list was complied, or any indication
of the reliability of the information.
|