|
By
Mar-Vic Cagurangan
Variety News Staff
THE government of
Guam badly needs to plug the revenue leaks that cause the depletion of
public coffers, Public Auditor Doris Flores Brooks said yesterday.
As early as February 2003, the Office of the Public Auditor has made a
bunch of recommendations which Brooks said could have reduced GovGuams
deficit and enhanced its revenue sources.
Whats happening here is that the cost containment has not
been working. We need to shore up our revenue base, Brooks said
in an interview with Variety.
Everybody is banking on the Marines arrival. I say lets
forget about the Marines. Lets shore up our own revenue base so
that when the Marines come, it would be the gravy, she added.
As GovGuams deficit continues to grow, only a few of OPAs
2003 recommendations have been implemented, Brooks said. OPA reported
yesterday that GovGuams deficit represents 70 percent of annual
revenues, and that Guam scored the lowest in the Office of Insular Affairs
financial performance evaluation of four insular territories. (See
related story)
The 2003 OPA report recommended the elimination of the retirees
cost of living allowance and replacing it with supplemental benefits only
for those retirees whose annuities are $30,000 a year or less, the lifting
of tax exemptions granted to various industries, increasing fees for various
services, and the abolition of Tendan Gobetno, among other things.
Brooks said in the last three budget acts, the Legislature implemented
OPAs recommendation to provide the supplement only to those
retirees whose basic annuity is $20,000 or less.
However, Brooks recalled that during the election period, senators scrambled
to give COLA even to those who were receiving $90,000 year.
Given our financial condition, it is difficult for the government
to pay the COLA, but we recognize that the people at the lower end are
the ones who need it most, Brooks told Variety.
Brooks is also pressing for the elimination of the Dave Santos Act gross
receipt tax exemptions, which at the time of the audit was estimated to
bring between $8 and $10 million into the government treasury.
The Dave Santos Act, in its original form, provided tax breaks to business
owners who were making less than $50,000 a year.
When the Dave Santos Act was conceptualized, it was originally intended
to grant exemptions only to small retailers such as fishermen and farmers
who sell their produce on weekends, Brooks said.
Over the years, however, the GRT exemptions have been expanded to include
virtually all businesses whose gross earnings are $500,000 or less. The
program now gives GRT exemption to bars, lawyers, accountants and insurance
agencies.
Subsequently, GovGuam is losing a major revenue base, Brooks said. We
need to take a closer look at the David Santos Act. We have too many tax
exemptions, she said.
Our next audit is focused on these tax exemptions, to see what industries
are getting tax credits and how much we are losing. Theres too much
leakage through these tax exemptions, Brooks added.
In an earlier interview, Revenue and Taxation director Art Ilagan said
GovGuam is losing $30 million a year to tax breaks.
Ive always been opposed to tax breaks. If every industry would
pay the 4 percent GRT, we wouldnt have this deficit, Brooks
said.
Another suggestion is to raise the fees for marriage licenses, drivers
licenses and health certificates, which Brooks said have not been modified in
over 20 years.
The cost of paper work and processing of license has increased.
If we raise the drivers license fee from $5 to $20 and multiply
that by 40,000, we will get $800,000, Brooks said, adding that raising
other service fees could generate close to $3 million in additional revenues
for the government.
Brooks also said abolishing Tendan Gobteno, the government store that
sells supplies, could generate potential savings of over $216,000 in salaries
and over $ 1 million by not carrying this inventory.
According to the OPA 2003 audit, the government store had an inventory
of $1.5 million and a receivable from the agencies of $1.8 million as
of Sept. 30, 2001.
The government has no business being in a business, Brooks said. The
government store competes with private businesses. As a result, we are
taking away business from businesses, she added.
|