Former school principal in child pornography case asks US court to suppress evidence, dismiss indictment
- Details
- Published on Tuesday, October 09, 2012 00:00
- Written by By Andrew O. De Guzman - Reporter
- Hits: 578
FORMER Whispering Palms School principal Thomas Weindl, 67, has asked the federal court to dismiss the indictment with prejudice in the event his motion to suppress is ultimately granted, according to his attorney David Banes.
Weindl’s lawyer said the motion seeks to suppress all evidence obtained by the federal government’s “warrantless search of an office laptop in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”The search, Banes said, utilized internet surveillance software E-blaster that was “surreptitiously installed” on Weindl’s computer by the Federal Bureau of Investigation “without a warrant.”
“The absence of a search warrant renders the government’s actions in this case per se unreasonable. Therefore, all evidence obtained from this warrantless search must be excluded at trial including all ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ evidence derived thereto,” Banes said.
He said “the [federal] government’s use of computer surveillance software without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment.”
Banes added that “the government’s failure to give Miranda warning prior to questioning [Weindl] warrants suppression.”
According to the federal government, Weindl, a Finasisu resident, received and accessed “still image and video files depicting minor children engaging in sexually explicit conduct” using a federally funded school laptop that was earlier issued to a Whispering Palms student, a son of an FBI special agent who had installed the E-blaster software to monitor the boy’s online activity.
Before relocating to the states, the father returned the school-issued laptop to Weindl.
Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the pretrial detention order imposed by U.S. District Court for the NMI Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona on Weindl who has been indicted on child pornography charges.
Manglona ruled that Weindl did not rebut the presumption under 18 United States Code section 3142 (e) that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure appellant’s appearance and the safety of the community. She then ordered Weindl’s detention pending trial.
Manglona said Weindl’s jury trial starts on Nov. 27, 2012. It was supposed to begin on Oct. 1, 2012 but both parties asked the court to reschedule it so they could have more time to prepare.
Weindl entered a not guilty plea to the charges of receipt of child pornography, and two counts of access with intent to view child pornography that the prosecution said separately occurred on June 15 and 18, 2012.
Weindl remains under the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service, and has been detained at the CNMI Department of Corrections facility since the FBI arrested him on June 28, 2012.
More Local News
- BREAKING NEWS: NMI Supreme Court sanctions AG Joey San Nicolas and Assistant AG Charles Brasington
- Comet hunting on Saipan
- DPW defends landfill contract with Tangs Corp.
- IT&E employees, families clean up Beach Road pathway
- Critters and worms – snacks to go
- Rota resident says water outages bad for business
- Concerned citizen opposes electronic gambling
- Cancer group to hold series of events for Survivors Day
- Rotarians urged to raise funds for possible relocation of Micro Beach playground
- Humanities Council invites community to book launching, upcoming programs
- Jury trial of Tinian Dynasty Hotel, officials to start in July
- NMC Class of 2013 picks Galvin Deleon Guerrero as keynote speaker
- Judge Manglona orders fugitive businessman to appear in court
- Jury trial in sex-trafficking case starts
- Inos OKs $60K for Rota
- Trustee: Bond may be a partial solution
- Vicente Norita gets 3 years for theft, burglary
- House supports extension of transition period
- Maryann Lizama to be acting CPA executive director
- Cruz questions NMI bar’s evaluation


Comments
He thinks about child porn like many of our elected officials think about giving us all the shaft, stealing us blind. They think it is OK as long as they do not get caught. Just look at Fitial and the impeachment process. I did nothing wrong. I did not have sex with that woman (Clinton's infamous words). My mansion is not finished being built yet in CA. I need these next 2 years as gov to scam enough $$$ to finish it.
I do not have any compassion for this guy, more so since he was a school Principal. BUT as a layman, I could perceive this to be similar to an illegal wire tap as there was no court order.
Since this is a Fed. charge I am curious as to why this FBI agent did not get such an order to further monitor this guy so they could gather further evidence. (if in fact this was the way to do it).
Could this guy walk because of this? They got a court order to seize the computer and contents, after the fact.