Variations | And it’s not even crunch time yet

Editorials & Columns
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

THE conference was called “Planning for the CNMI’s Economic Future,” and it was held at the Hyatt on March 18-19, 1999 in response to what was then the most serious economic downturn that the islands had to face since the early years of the Commonwealth. Among the speakers/presenters were U.S. economist consultants, economic professors and business executives.

In his introductory remarks, J.M. Jack Peters, the director of NMC’s Business Development Center, said:

“Historically, the CNMI has economically outperformed every U.S. territory or insular area, some states, and most of its Pacific island neighbors. As my friends on Tinian might say: the CNMI took the hand it was dealt and responded accordingly. It used its status as Commonwealth under the sovereignty of the United States. It used its proximity to Asia; it used its conditional duty-free access to U.S. markets; it used tax incentives; it used its access to foreign capital; it used its ingenuity; and it sharpened its entrepreneurial spirit. No transgression or allegation, by any industry, by any company or by any individual can nullify this achievement by the CNMI.”

However, he added, “it now looks as though the CNMI has been dealt a new hand. As we are all aware, things have changed…. The CNMI visitor industry has been hit hard by the Asian downturn.”
Peters also warned that the departure or decline of the garment industry “could have serious depressive effects on the CNMI economy for several years.” He said economic analysis “reminds us of something else we should never forget. This is the CNMI. It is not the U.S. mainland. While economic theory doesn’t really care where it is applied, specific business location conditions matter a great deal from a policy, program or development standpoint. [There are] some important business location differences between the CNMI and the average U.S. city; differences, which quite understandably, might call for different local and federal policies or programs.”

He said an NMC-Business Development Center study team was examining existing and new industry opportunities. “We are not so interested in low wage, low productivity third world industries. No; we think the CNMI is better than that….” But aside from identifying development opportunities, “we must know if the CNMI can accommodate them. Do we have the land, the infrastructure, the skilled workers, the capital, transportation in sufficient quantities and qualities to exploit…development opportunities? If we not have what is needed, we have to find out how we can get it. We will have to determine which industries could feasibly operate and flourish here with what we already have to offer….”

Peters added another caveat:

“This whole matter of identifying opportunities and constraints concerning economic development is difficult enough in an increasingly competitive world…. We are all, to some extent, affected by market and cost forces beyond our control. To a large extent, the prices and costs…will be dictated to us by others or the market mechanism…. We have to design or identify productive processes that are feasible in the CNMI. Because of prevailing competitive conditions, even this may not be enough.”

He added, “You have all probably noticed that investors are not, or maybe no longer, stampeding to invest directly in the CNMI. This brings us to a quite critical and final issue, the broad issue of the CNMI’s business and investment climate…. This is important because where cost and price conditions might be roughly equal with competing areas, the CNMI’s business climate might be decisive in an investment decision.”

Economic development, Peters said, “is difficult enough in the Pacific islands. There is a great deal going against it including distance, scale considerations and limited resources. Add in a serious recession and we have a recipe for a full-blown economic disaster….”

He was talking about a pre-Covid-19 CNMI that still controlled its immigration and minimum wage policies. Both are now under direct federal supervision which has further shrunk the islands’ economic options — and ability to pay their mounting obligations.

Sadly, it’s no longer enough to express concern about the current dismal state of the economy or to, now and then, throw in words like “sustainability,” “balanced development,” “planning” while insisting that we really “support” the economy like we really “support” PSS! CHCC! DPS! Transparency! The Children! The People!

Send feedback to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

previous arrow
next arrow

Read more articles