DELEGATE King-Hinds argues that workforce training alone is not enough to solve the CNMI’s economic crisis, stating that jobs must be available after training. However, training is often necessary to improve employability, especially when higher education is inaccessible. She also emphasizes that businesses can only hire when customers spend money, but the CNMI’s lack of tourism hinders economic growth.
Tourism is crucial, yet the government has not made the CNMI more accessible to foreign visitors. Language barriers persist, and efforts to improve infrastructure and attractions are limited by financial constraints. While King-Hinds pushes for expanded visa-free travel, relying on one market — such as China — has already caused issues, as seen with Best Sunshine. Additionally, she blames the current economic state on government actions rather than events like Covid-19, ignoring how the pandemic’s impact on flights and businesses played a significant role.
King-Hinds claims to support the federal government’s actions, but what exactly is she supporting? The removal of DEI programs? The potential closure of the Department of Education? These policies harm marginalized groups, students, and the CNMI’s future. As the first female delegate, she was expected to bring positive change, yet her actions appear to prioritize political interests over the needs of the people.
If she truly represents the CNMI, she must address these concerns instead of ignoring them. Otherwise, it raises the question: Is she working for the people or for personal and party gain?
MARI THOMPSON
Dandan, Saipan
