“The CNMI must ask not just what it can gain, but what it might lose.” — Floyd Masga, BECQ administrator
AS the U.S. government explores the possibility of leasing parts of the seabed around the CNMI for deep-sea mining, the community finds itself at a crossroads. The debate has drawn passionate voices from both sides — those who see opportunity and those who see danger. What follows is a clear-eyed look at the arguments and what they could mean for the future of the Marianas.
Proponents argue that the CNMI could benefit in several ways:
– Economic development: Mining rare earth elements such as cobalt, nickel, and lithium — critical for green technologies — could bring jobs, infrastructure upgrades, and new revenue to the islands.
– Strategic relevance: As global demand for critical minerals grows, the CNMI could become a key player in the U.S. supply chain for clean energy and defense technologies.
– Scientific advancement: Exploration could lead to new discoveries about the deep ocean, potentially benefiting marine science and technological innovation.
Opponents raise serious concerns:
– Environmental harm: The deep ocean is one of the least understood ecosystems on Earth. Mining could cause irreversible damage to fragile habitats and species that may never recover.
– Cultural and spiritual impact: For many in the Marianas, the ocean is sacred. Mining could sever deep-rooted cultural ties and spiritual connections to the sea.
– Lack of transparency and consent: Critics argue that the federal government’s process has been rushed and top-down, with limited consultation with CNMI and Guam communities — raising fears of neocolonial exploitation.
– Regulatory gaps: There is no comprehensive international framework governing deep-sea mining, leaving significant legal and ethical questions unanswered.
Proceed with caution, center the community
The weight of evidence leans toward caution. While the economic potential is real, it remains speculative and long-term. In contrast, the environmental and cultural risks are immediate and potentially permanent.
In short, the ocean is not just a resource — it is a legacy. Any decision about its future must be made with wisdom, unity, and the long view in mind.
Thank you.
NOEL M. SORIA
Gualo Rai, Saipan
