NMI to seek alternative funding sources for fishery development

The annual meeting of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission was held recently in the Cook Islands.

The annual meeting of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission was held recently in the Cook Islands.

Sylvan Igisomar

Sylvan Igisomar

RAROTONGA, Cook Islands — The annual meeting of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission held recently in the Cook Islands was deemed a success as there was a consensus on a revised tropical tuna conservation and management measure or CMM for 2024 through 2026. Covering almost 60% of the world’s tuna supply, this measure establishes global regulations governing the fishing of bigeye, skipjack and yellowfin  tuna.  The  WCPFC  increased  the  U.S.  Hawaii-based  longline  fishery  bigeye  tuna annual catch limit from 3,554 to 6,554 metric tons after considering the healthy stock status.

“Although this is a win for the Hawai‘i longline fishery, it is a loss in fishery development funding  opportunities  for  the  Pacific  territories,”  said CNMI delegation head  Sylvan Igisomar, who is also the secretary of the Department of Lands and Natural Resources.  The  United  States was unsuccessful in preserving a provision in the tropical tuna CMM allowing for the transfer of catch portions to the Hawai‘i longline fishery in exchange for funds under specified fishing agreements. These agreements and funding have supported critical fishery development initiatives in the CNMI since 2010. American Samoa and CNMI leadership expressed  frustration  that plans  were  not  in  place to make up for lost fishery development funding before the possible removal of this provision.

The specified fishing agreements have funded initiatives from the CNMI Marine Conservation Plan or MCP   like  the  Garapan  Fishing  Base  shoreline  revetment  project,  efforts  to improve fishery data collections for stock assessments, and bottomfish workshops and training for the fishing community to name a few. The Magnuson-Stevens Act mandates that the MCP comprise conservation and management objectives such as marine and fisheries research, and conservation, education and enforcement activities related to marine and coastal management. The  MCP  must  also  be  consistent  with  the  Western Pacific Fishery Management Council’s Fishery Ecosystem Plans.

“No sense in crying over spilled milk, what’s done is done and now we must work with our federal partners on a replacement for this critical resource that will no longer be available,” said Igisomar during the regular session of the 197th Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council.

Igisomar recommended to the council to activate the provisions of the Pacific Insular Area Fishery Agreement or PIAFA authorized under the Magnuson-Stevens Act.

Council members also recommended that the National Marine Fisheries Service and other relevant federal agencies provide funding for projects under the territorial MCPs.

Looking ahead, funds for MCP projects can also come through a PIAFA, authorized under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and negotiated and signed by the secretary of State. A PIAFA would allow foreign fishing within the 200-mile U.S. exclusive economic zone around the CNMI with the concurrence of the governor.  These  foreign  vessels  would  be  required  to  abide  by  U.S.  conservation  and management laws, including at-sea observers.

Trending

Weekly Poll

Latest E-edition

Please login to access your e-Edition.

+