While simultaneously, O’Connor et.al. intends to provide free legal services in representing Mr. Cruz — who is anti-anti-federalization — as to Mr. Cruz’s issues with human rights activist Ms. Doromal.
So then, if Mr. Cruz now tries to participate by intervention/amicus filing of anti-anti-federalization nature in the Washington, D.C. court, well, then will O’Connor et.al. lawyers for Mr. Rasa then contest O’Connor et.al. lawyers for Mr. Cruz?
Or, what if Ms. Doromal tries to participate (like Mr. Rasa will via O’Connor et.al.) as a pro-federalization intervenor/amicus party in the Washington, D.C. court, and then names Mr. Cruz as a party there, putting at odds O’Connor et.al.’s non-paying anti-federalization client Mr. Rasa and O’Connor et.al.’s other non-paying anti-anti-federalization client Mr. Cruz.
Will then O’Connor et. al. attorneys maybe choose to represent neither Mr. Rasa nor Mr. Cruz but, instead, provide free legal services to Ms. Doromal?
Or will O’Connor et.al. attorneys maybe choos to provide free representation to all of them?
Can I have some free O’Connor et.al. legal representation some time, maybe, too?
Or just some free money or something else free instead?
It’s all so confusing. But free-fee-sounding, nei?
BRUCE L. JORGENSEN
Washington, D.C.
